This brief essay, drawn from my historical research for “The Volunteers,” the first installment of Hidden Cabinet’s “Tending the Wounded” series, appeared today on the website of the Botstiber Institute for Austrian-American Studies.

The website and blog of Mark S. Weiner
This brief essay, drawn from my historical research for “The Volunteers,” the first installment of Hidden Cabinet’s “Tending the Wounded” series, appeared today on the website of the Botstiber Institute for Austrian-American Studies.

The Hamburg chapter of Scientists for Future International has released a new podcast in which I discuss the philosophical ideas animating Hidden Cabinet’s documentary about the Austrian mountain rescue service. The first few minutes are in German, but then we switch into English.

My essay “Toward a Democratic Theory of Emergency Medical Services: Solidarity, Sovereignty, Temporality,” has been published in the most recent issue of Telos (Summer 2022). The theme of the issue is “Challenging State Sovereignty: Mutual Aid or Civil War?”

As I explain in my introduction:
“This essay considers whether a democratic theory of the routine work of medical first responders could help inform the development of a more robust culture of sovereignty in modern liberal democracies. The goal of such a theory would be to make liberalism better able to foster human flourishing and more likely to endure as a political form.
“The essay draws on three main intuitions. First, the local structures of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), especially volunteer ambulance corps as institutions of community solidarity and mutual aid, can form the basis of an emancipatory biopolitics. EMS thereby offers a means to activate democratic self-governance more broadly. Second, medical first-responder protocols and practices have the potential to resonate symbolically throughout civic life as quasi-ritual actions that could help root the friend-enemy distinction at the heart of political community less in the identification of enmity and more in the cultivation of pluralistic amity and the exercise of care across lines of class and ethnic difference. This effort would aim not to suppress politics in the interest of humanity as a whole but rather to clarify and deepen the political. Finally, and relatedly, employing EMS as a framework through which to shape civic life could help forge a more sustainable liberalism by placing it on the philosophical ground of human bodily and moral nature, especially the many ways in which as human beings we are subject to, and subjects in, time. EMS as a model for civic practice could strengthen liberalism by linking it to a lively apprehension of species-level truth.
“In building from these intuitions here, I seek to triangulate between insights that I have gained as a participant observer in EMS and a novice medic myself; the traditions of German phenomenology in which critical theory finds its roots, from which I take broad inspiration; and a close reading of a work of popular protest music from the late twentieth century, Public Enemy’s “911 is a Joke,” that obliquely yet trenchantly reveals the cultural structure underlying the status of emergency medicine as a political institution. The writing of Walt Whitman adds a brief fourth element that links “911 is a Joke” to an American tradition in which the subject of physical care and personal health serves as an Archimedean point of leverage for immanent political critique.”
Telos is available through academic libraries, through individual subscriptions, and (behind a paywall) on the journal’s website.
My article “EMS for Democracy: The Case of Människan Bakom Uniformen“ appeared today as the cover story in the fall issue of the UK-based, European-wide magazine Ambulance Today (see the link at page nine). The article is the first in a series that will consider emergency medical services, especially the work of ambulance personnel, from the perspective of democratic social and political theory.
*
Update 1/29/20: for the next article in this series, see the latest issue of Ambulance Today. This article considers the significance of EMS volunteerism, and is accompanied by four interviews with EMS practitioners in Sweden, Austria, Israel and the United States.
*
Update 2/20/20: I recently gave a talk about EMS and social theory at a conference on mutual aid sponsored by the journal Telos. The talk can be found here.

For the past six months I’ve been living in Sweden, serving as the Fulbright Distinguished Chair in American Studies at Uppsala University. I’ve been teaching and lecturing about U.S. constitutional law, and I’ve been learning a lot about Sweden, too. I’ve been especially interested in understanding reported tensions between emergency medical service providers and immigrant communities.
As part of that work, I recently got to know an innovative community outreach program called the Person Behind the Uniform, which brings young people and first responders together to learn about each other’s lives. You can learn more about the program in an article and three documentary videos I published in the Journal of Emergency Medical Services, here. I think it’s a fantastic thing—in fact, I think it provides the philosophical seeds for reframing the entire social contract in a nation undergoing rapid demographic change.
I spoke about a set of related issues recently to the Swedish magazines Respons (here; in Swedish) and Kvartal (here; in English), and at a panel discussion at Culture House co-sponsored by the publisher Fri Tanke and the Royal Academy of Science (here; in English), and I’ve meditated for Expressen (here; in English) on why an increasingly multicultural Sweden ought to institute a civics test for citizenship (hint: it’s not especially to test immigrants). I also spoke early during my time in country to Fri Tanke for its Friday podcast series (here; in English)—and look for an interview with me to be published soon in the online journal Quillette.
Many of these discussions and publications touch on my book The Rule of the Clan, which I’m honored played a role in the thinking of Per Brinkemo as he and Johan Lundberg put together their influential edited collection Klanen (discussed here, in Swedish; see circa time stamps 1:40 and 9:50).
For anyone interested in other things I’ve published in Sweden, you might check out a series of op eds in Dagens Nyheter (about Trumpism and the philosophy of world order; about the Swedish parliamentary elections; about political roadblocks to gun control in America; and about President Trump’s then-threat to declare a national emergency to fund the border wall).
For readers who have come to this post because of their interest in the work of a Fulbright scholar, you might be interested to know that during my time here I’ve also (more…)
I have a short essay today in Project Syndicate called “Trumpism and the Philosophy of World Order.”
This piece follows a commentary that I wrote for Project Syndicate some time back about Trumpism and the philosophy of history, as well as an essay for the Niskanen Center and a talk for the most recent annual conference of Telos about Trumpism, historical consciousness, and climate change denial.
I am delighted to share the news that Law’s Picture Books has received the Joseph L. Andrews Legal Literature Award from the American Association of Law Libraries! And thus in Connecticut we break out the champagne!

This video includes my reflections on Trumpism and historical consciousness at the 2018 Telos-Paul Piccone Institute conference. The talk was part of a panel about U.S. political movements, with fellow panelists Tim Luke, David Pan, and Russell Berman. My remarks begin at about 13:50.
At the end of the talk, I had a bit of a slip of the tongue and referred to Bernhard Schlink, author of The Reader, as Prof. Carl Schmitt—which he most definitely is not!
***
I am very pleased to share the good news that in 2018-19, I will be the Fulbright Uppsala University Distinguished Chair in American Studies. I’m looking forward to getting to know my new colleagues and students in Sweden!
“Law’s Picture Books” has been hailed as “fascinating” by The New Yorker, “eye-opening” by the Wall Street Journal, and “courageous” by the Frankfurter Allgemeine, and now it’s been praised as exceptional by The New Criterion—and it’s still on display at the Grolier Club until November 18!
If you can’t make it, my co-curator and I have just completed our digital gallery tour of the exhibit on the blog Concurring Opinions. Here are links to all the stops along the way:
Today in the Open Society series of the Niskanen Center, I argue that climate change denial is a central form of historical consciousness under Trumpism. You can find the essay here.